Those vtecs are tunable

Posts

Post 632637 by T5frankie on 2013-08-05 15:37:23

I went with my mate kriston to get his car mapped up after he built it, its an old eg civic, some of you saw his old red one at avon, he sold that one and bought this one, started off as a 1.3, the engine was quickly pulled out in favour of a 1.8 vti v-tech engine, he then ordered his turbo conversion kit from the states, and he has been building this one slowly as funds allowed, reason for posting is all the power we chase from our 2.3's is ridiculous when at only 10 psi on his 1.8 the car makes this kind of power, and remember it only weighs around 900kgs, so has got some power to weight ratio. Image like the torque curve? lol Image

Post 632642 by M-R-P on 2013-08-05 15:49:00

Good graph too.

Post 632662 by Nealevo on 2013-08-05 16:57:33

There is a lad at work with a s2000 with turbo, it's not running silly boost either but it really does shift. That graph is very good

Post 632683 by Mongo on 2013-08-05 17:43:19

My mates cvic type r is running 506bhp and was mapped in an hour unbelivable power dont make much torque tho

Post 632687 by T5frankie on 2013-08-05 18:01:29

[QUOTE=Mongo;632683]My mates cvic type r is running 506bhp and was mapped in an hour unbelivable power dont make much torque tho[/QUOTE] when you gonna get yours on the strip and beat deans time? lol

Post 632688 by cherry1809 on 2013-08-05 18:03:12

[QUOTE=T5frankie;632637]I went with my mate kriston to get his car mapped up after he built it, its an old eg civic, some of you saw his old red one at avon, he sold that one and bought this one, started off as a 1.3, the engine was quickly pulled out in favour of a 1.8 vti v-tech engine, he then ordered his turbo conversion kit from the states, and he has been building this one slowly as funds allowed, reason for posting is all the power we chase from our 2.3's is ridiculous when at only 10 psi on his 1.8 the car makes this kind of power, and remember it only weighs around 900kgs, so has got some power to weight ratio. Image like the torque curve? lol Image[/QUOTE] My Bluebird was the same. 1.8 16v completely stock engine responded a LOT better to relatively minor mods, compared to the bigger Volvo engine.

Post 632739 by smithy on 2013-08-05 19:40:43

This is mainly due to the compression ratio being higher so you don't need to run that much boost to get the power out of them .and in Sweden and the USA they run n/a redblocks with turbos and get some amazing power out of them .but you need to listen to detention alot more due to the compression ratio .

Post 632740 by smithy on 2013-08-05 19:42:43

Just a question is that crank power or whp but what ever it is it will be quick due to its weight .but would still like to know though

Post 632741 by LiamT4 on 2013-08-05 19:43:10

Also, it does help when the engine can rev to 8k.........

Post 632744 by T5frankie on 2013-08-05 19:48:11

[QUOTE=LiamT4;632741]Also, it does help when the engine can rev to 8k.........[/QUOTE] look at the graph though it would keep on climbing if it didnt run out of revs

Post 632747 by T5frankie on 2013-08-05 19:49:41

[QUOTE=smithy;632740]Just a question is that crank power or whp but what ever it is it will be quick due to its weight .but would still like to know though[/QUOTE] lol not sure mate

Post 632797 by cherry1809 on 2013-08-05 21:10:06

My EF ran out of puff at 9k... Such a light weight. Lol.

Post 632802 by Mongo on 2013-08-05 21:19:36

[QUOTE=T5frankie;632687]when you gonna get yours on the strip and beat deans time? lol[/QUOTE] Ahh mate ive had a few problems top mounts were destroyed, O/S/R and N/S/F kw dampers decided to colapse lol so im waiting on a new set ti be deliverd theb touch wood ill be ready!!!

Post 632862 by Palmer on 2013-08-05 23:05:41

To the wrong wheels though... right guys :D?

Post 633190 by Gold 'N' Brown on 2013-08-07 10:46:32

[QUOTE=T5frankie;632637] in favour of a 1.8 vti v-tech [/QUOTE] Mate of mine stuck a Vtech in his car but we weren't too impressed with it [ATTACH=CONFIG]22156[/ATTACH]

Post 633193 by M-R-P on 2013-08-07 11:04:38

Hahahahaha, my lad's got one of those lol

Post 633194 by NORDIC R on 2013-08-07 11:23:15

B20 bottom block ( crv/hrv) K20 top half (ctr) Port n polished With Nugent twin loop Skunk 2 cams Garret gt35 turbo Sneaked in to a ek9 shell few years back in Ireland The thing was pulling off close to 600 Bhp Scary cars

Post 633221 by Gold 'N' Brown on 2013-08-07 14:07:59

Don't think K and B series blocks and heads are compatible are they?

Post 633274 by NORDIC R on 2013-08-07 17:15:06

Bottoms and tops are

Post 638297 by T5frankie on 2013-08-24 18:47:47

my mate took his civic to santa pod he got a 12.8 at 112mph

Post 638322 by Gold 'N' Brown on 2013-08-24 19:51:24

[QUOTE=NORDIC R;633194]B20 bottom block ( crv/hrv) K20 top half (ctr) Port n polished With Nugent twin loop Skunk 2 cams Garret gt35 turbo Sneaked in to a ek9 shell few years back in Ireland The thing was pulling off close to 600 Bhp Scary cars[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Gold 'N' Brown;633221]Don't think K and B series blocks and heads are compatible are they?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=NORDIC R;633274]Bottoms and tops are[/QUOTE] But they're not. The B series rotates counter clockwise, whereas the K series rotates clockwise (conventionally). I guess it wouldn't be impossible to mate the two up, but it would need huge changes to work, and I'm not sure there would be any point in it. Are you sure it wasn't a K24 block (also in the later CRVs) and K20 head? That's a tried and tested combo. Be interesting to hear more details about it anyway. I'm no longer a big Civic fan but always interested in wild Honda engines.