A new take on the internal combustion engine.

Posts

Post 711142 by stribo on 2014-05-12 16:37:58

Will be interesting to see the development of this. [video=youtube_share;c19kn3drdFU]http://youtu.be/c19kn3drdFU[/video]

Post 711146 by Plodmonkey on 2014-05-12 16:44:02

Would love to hear what it sounded like

Post 711147 by oblark on 2014-05-12 16:46:18

But it wont get your down the strip any faster :P

Post 711148 by expolicev70t5 on 2014-05-12 16:48:31

Interesting!

Post 711149 by stribo on 2014-05-12 16:49:05

[QUOTE=oblark;711147]But it wont get your down the strip any faster :P[/QUOTE] It might, as it's lighter. ;)

Post 711151 by M-R-P on 2014-05-12 16:50:12

That single bottom end bearing is gonna need to be made from adamantium if it's gonna live for a worthwhile amount of time. The ££££el engine BLOODY SWEAR FILTER!! the Mazda rotary engine was thought to be a good idea but they still haven't got that right.

Post 711153 by oblark on 2014-05-12 16:58:34

[QUOTE=M-R-P;711151]That single bottom end bearing is gonna need to be made from adamantium if it's gonna live for a worthwhile amount of time. The ££££el engine BLOODY SWEAR FILTER!! the Mazda rotary engine was thought to be a good idea but they still haven't got that right.[/QUOTE] The problem with rotary engine is the tips on the rotors they wear quickly. If and when they find a material that doesn't wear and can take to heat/pressure then it would be a good replacement for the standard interal combustion engine.

Post 711154 by Wobbly Dave on 2014-05-12 17:00:55

Still looking backwards to my mind. Still reliant on oil regardless of how efficient it is.

Post 711156 by jamesy12345 on 2014-05-12 17:05:32

Hopefully the chaps in Big Oil can continue to suppress that kind of crazy talk.... http://www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/POWER/unusualICeng/axial-ICeng/axial-IC.htm

Post 711159 by jamesy12345 on 2014-05-12 17:16:39

Trebert Axial Barrel type IC Engine, patented in 1917 Image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_engine

Post 711164 by stribo on 2014-05-12 17:21:05

[QUOTE=Wobbly Dave;711154]Still looking backwards to my mind. Still reliant on oil regardless of how efficient it is.[/QUOTE] And long may it stay that way, doesn't matter what you do to it, an electric motor is never going to sound as good as a petrol engine.

Post 711188 by Wobbly Dave on 2014-05-12 18:11:12

Electric tech is also somewhat reliant on fossil fueling.

Post 711193 by Harvey on 2014-05-12 18:25:52

[QUOTE=Wobbly Dave;711188]Electric tech is also somewhat reliant on fossil fueling.[/QUOTE] Okay flux capacitor then :uglyhamme

Post 711302 by Plodmonkey on 2014-05-12 23:03:49

they did perfect the ££££el its called a turbo nothing sounds better in this world than BRAP BRAP BRAP [video=youtube;BbqKxNYj6lE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbqKxNYj6lE[/video]

Post 711327 by zoidberg on 2014-05-13 00:32:18

so how is the 'revolving' surface sealed from the static surface then ?? Surely anyone who has had a head gasket blow would wonder how you seal a revolving surface !

Post 711333 by jamesy12345 on 2014-05-13 03:52:13

[QUOTE=zoidberg;711327]so how is the 'revolving' surface sealed from the static surface then ?? Surely anyone who has had a head gasket blow would wonder how you seal a revolving surface ![/QUOTE] it doesn't only rotate - it 'nutates', so cat in hells chance of sealing it reliably http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutating_disc_engine Image

Post 711345 by M-R-P on 2014-05-13 08:23:29

[QUOTE=Plodmonkey;711302]they did perfect the ££££el its called a turbo nothing sounds better in this world than BRAP BRAP BRAP [/QUOTE] Sorry - I have to disagree there. My chainsaw sounds better than that and it won't blow itself to bits after prolonged 10+k rpm sessions. Say what you like, there's no beating a big V8 with stainless pipes... [video=youtube;kE4a-fDpPuo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kE4a-fDpPuo[/video]

Post 711349 by p fandango on 2014-05-13 09:06:37

even the new RX-8's are known to have issues, regularly between 20k-60k, thats not what i'd call a "perfected" engine

Post 711350 by M-R-P on 2014-05-13 09:15:38

My mates old one... Image He never serviced it in the 3 years he had it and although it was a little twitchy at times, never really gave him any trouble. He sold it and bought an audi A3 3.2 quattro :slap: 252bhp, 320Nm, 1800Kg. Numpty.

Post 711351 by p fandango on 2014-05-13 09:18:41

V6 reg plate on a rotatory engined car lol

Post 711352 by M-R-P on 2014-05-13 09:20:14

[QUOTE=p fandango;711351]V6 reg plate on a rotatory engined car lol[/QUOTE] Ending with "RXB" tho so not too far out lol. It was a blast on wet roundabouts tho ;)

Post 711354 by Plodmonkey on 2014-05-13 09:49:41

Na rx7 the 8s were crap should have turbo'd them v8s are nice but no wa nkel

Post 711356 by M-R-P on 2014-05-13 09:59:20

[QUOTE=Plodmonkey;711354]Na rx7 the 8s were crap should have turbo'd them v8s are nice but no wa nkel[/QUOTE] There's a very good reason for not boosting the 11000rpm rotary on the RX8... :splat:

Post 711357 by stribo on 2014-05-13 10:12:04

[QUOTE=M-R-P;711345]Sorry - I have to disagree there. My chainsaw sounds better than that and it won't blow itself to bits after prolonged 10+k rpm sessions. Say what you like, there's no beating a big V8 with stainless pipes... [video=youtube;kE4a-fDpPuo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kE4a-fDpPuo[/video][/QUOTE] The rotary engine is better at prolonged high speed running, which is why a Mazda 787 won Le Mans in 1991, it wasn't as quick as its competitors, but it was more reliable.

Post 711362 by Wobbly Dave on 2014-05-13 11:44:05

[QUOTE=Harvey;711193]Okay flux capacitor then :uglyhamme[/QUOTE] From the available technologies I would say hydrogen fuel cell is certainly one way that should be explored.

Post 711363 by jamesy12345 on 2014-05-13 12:07:11

[QUOTE=Wobbly Dave;711362]From the available technologies I would say hydrogen fuel cell is certainly one way that should be explored.[/QUOTE] a fair bit of development needed - not very good in cold climates

Post 711367 by stribo on 2014-05-13 12:59:47

[QUOTE=Wobbly Dave;711362]From the available technologies I would say hydrogen fuel cell is certainly one way that should be explored.[/QUOTE] If they can find a clean way of producing hydrogen.

Post 711372 by jamesy12345 on 2014-05-13 13:19:41

[QUOTE=stribo;711367]If they can find a clean way of producing hydrogen.[/QUOTE] pipe it in from saturn most hydrogen currently produced by......fossil fuels again, not even mentioning evironmental impact of mining for platinum

Post 711377 by Plodmonkey on 2014-05-13 14:02:26

[QUOTE=stribo;711357]The rotary engine is better at prolonged high speed running, which is why a Mazda 787 won Le Mans in 1991, it wasn't as quick as its competitors, but it was more reliable.[/QUOTE] Yep and I will only have a Rx7 as a toy to do a bit of track hooning

Post 711378 by M-R-P on 2014-05-13 14:05:27

What happened to that bloke who was putting a T5 lump in an RX7? looked like an interesting build.

Post 711380 by jamesy12345 on 2014-05-13 14:10:23

[QUOTE=M-R-P;711378]What happened to that bloke who was putting a T5 lump in an RX7? looked like an interesting build.[/QUOTE] Someone doing it here.... [video=youtube;SAhgzkKe6FI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAhgzkKe6FI[/video]

Post 711381 by M-R-P on 2014-05-13 14:13:29

[QUOTE=jamesy12345;711380]Someone doing it here.... [video=youtube;SAhgzkKe6FI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAhgzkKe6FI[/video][/QUOTE] That's the bugger... nice to see it coming together, wouldn't mind an update or two tho.

Post 711384 by merc85 on 2014-05-13 14:29:23

I recon thats gonna sound like my mises washing machine lol

Post 711389 by M-R-P on 2014-05-13 14:58:46

[QUOTE=merc85;711384]I recon thats gonna sound like my mises washing machine lol[/QUOTE] Is that with or without her sat on it? :D

Post 711394 by merc85 on 2014-05-13 16:24:26

[quote=m-r-p;711389]is that with or without her sat on it? :d[/quote] lol

Post 712877 by Saaamon on 2014-05-19 12:54:21

[QUOTE=Wobbly Dave;711154]Still looking backwards to my mind. Still reliant on oil regardless of how efficient it is.[/QUOTE] Couldn't agree with you anymore!